Re: [PATCH 0/6] Do not use sysdevs for implementing "core" PM operations on x86

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > If there are no objectsions, I'd like to push these patches through the suspend
> > tree.
> 
> [1/8] has been merged in the meantime and [3/8] has been included into the
> ACPI tree.  if there are no objections, I'm going to push the following
> patches to Linus this week through the suspend-2.6 tree:
> 
> [1/6] - Convert sysdev users in arch/x86 to using struct syscore_ops.
> 
> [2/6] - Make timekeeping use struct syscore_ops for suspend/resume.
>  
> [3/6] - Make Intel IOMMU use struct syscore_ops for suspend/resume.
> 
> [4/6] - Make KVM use struct syscore_ops for suspend/resume.
> 
> [5/6] - Make cpufreq use struct syscore_ops for boot CPU suspend/resume.
> 
> [6/6] - Introduce config switch allowing architectures to skip sysdev
>         suspend/resume/shutdown code.

The x86 bits look fine.

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>

The patches affect a lot of hardware so please make sure they are tested well 
before pushing them to Linus :-)

	Ingo
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux