On Thursday, March 10, 2011, Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 09:13:05PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > > > None of the existing cpufreq drivers uses the second argument of > > its .suspend() callback (which isn't useful anyway), so remove it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Hi, > > > > This patch is requisite for sysdevs rework discussed here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/9/439 > > Please apply or let me know if I can take it to the suspend tree. > > Looks ok to me. > > applied and queued for .39 Thanks! Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
