On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 22:39 +0100, "Sedat Dilek" <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This fixes the following breakage in linux-next (next-20110308): > AS arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_rm.o > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_rm.S: Assembler messages: > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_rm.S:12: Error: .size expression with > symbol `wakeup_code_start' does not evaluate to a constant > > The issue was introduced by commit > d1ee433539ea5963a8f946f3428b335d1c5fdb20: > "x86, trampoline: Use the unified trampoline setup for ACPI wakeup" > > The problem was discovered while using Debian's binutils > (2.21.0.20110302-1) > and experimenting with binutils from upstream. > > Thanks Alexander and H.J. for the vital help. > > CC: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxx> > CC: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@xxxxxxxxx> > CC: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx> > CC: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> > CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> > CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> > CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> > CC: x86@xxxxxxxxxx > CC: linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > CC: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > CC: linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxx> (This problem exists in the x86-tree. Mainline is fine.) > --- > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_rm.S | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_rm.S > b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_rm.S > index 6ce81ee..63b8ab5 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_rm.S > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_rm.S > @@ -9,4 +9,4 @@ > .globl acpi_wakeup_code > acpi_wakeup_code: > .incbin "arch/x86/kernel/acpi/realmode/wakeup.bin" > - .size wakeup_code_start, .-wakeup_code_start > + .size acpi_wakeup_code, .-acpi_wakeup_code > -- > 1.7.4.1 > > _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm