On Wednesday, February 23, 2011, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > The following set of patches modify this implementation to use Hibernate style > > > > control flow (freeze/restore for save/restore and freeze/thaw for checkpoint, > > > > which is merely a cancelled save akin to failed swsusp() ). > > > > > > > > These patches are against Ian Campbell's PVHVM tree at > > > > git://xenbits.xen.org/people/ianc/linux-2.6.git for-stefano/pvhvm > > > > > > > > at commit 8a8d1bc753c4e2dda5f2890292d60c67d6ebb573 > > > > kernel version: 2.6.38-rc4 > > > > > > Series looks ok to me... > > > > Thanks Pavel, may we take that as an Acked-by? > > ok. > > > For my part the Xen side is: > > Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > The changes to drivers/xen/manage.c depend on some other cleanups made > > on the Xen side (in linux-next soon if not already via Stefano's tree) > > so how would you like to handle them? I could point you to a suitable to > > apply the pm.h bits to or we could carry them in the Xen tree if you are > > happy with them. > > Rafael maintains pm tree these days... Rafael? It doesn't matter a lot. The Xen people will need to wait for the previous PM patches to be merged anyway, so I can take the PM bits, so long as I know which patches are for me to take. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
