On Sat 2011-02-19 15:12:35, Shriram Rajagopalan wrote: > The current implementation of xen guest save/restore/checkpoint functionality > uses PM_SUSPEND and PM_RESUME events. This is not optimal when taking > checkpoints of a virtual machine (where the suspend hypercall returns > non-zero, requiring the devices and xenbus to just pickup from where they left > off instead of a complete teardown/reconnect to backend). > > The following set of patches modify this implementation to use Hibernate style > control flow (freeze/restore for save/restore and freeze/thaw for checkpoint, > which is merely a cancelled save akin to failed swsusp() ). > > These patches are against Ian Campbell's PVHVM tree at > git://xenbits.xen.org/people/ianc/linux-2.6.git for-stefano/pvhvm > > at commit 8a8d1bc753c4e2dda5f2890292d60c67d6ebb573 > kernel version: 2.6.38-rc4 Series looks ok to me... -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
