On Thursday, February 17, 2011, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:58:56AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > > > USB defines usb_device_type pointing to usb_device_pm_ops that > > provides system-wide PM callbacks only and usb_bus_type pointing to > > usb_bus_pm_ops that provides runtime PM callbacks only. However, > > the USB runtime PM callbacks may be defined in usb_device_pm_ops > > which makes it possible to drop usb_bus_pm_ops and will allow us > > to consolidate the handling of subsystems by the PM core code. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > Would you mind if I merged the following patch? It is requisite for > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/552411/ which I think is the right thing > > to do and people seem to generally agree with me. > > > > Alan has seen it and says it is fine. > > Looks great to me, feel free to add: > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx> > to it and take it through your tree. I will, thanks! Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
