On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > The reason why runtime suspend is not allowed during system power transitions > > if the following race: > > > > - A device has been suspended via a system suspend callback. > > - The runtime PM framework executes a (scheduled) suspend on that device, > > not knowing that it's already been suspended, which potentially results in > > accessing the device's registers in a low-power state. > > > > Now, it can be avoided if every driver does the right thing and checks whether > > the device is already suspended in its runtime suspend callback, but that would > > kind of defeat the purpose of the runtime PM framework, at least partially. > > In fact, I've just realized that the above race cannot really occur, because > pm_wq is freezable, so I'm proposing the following change. Yes, I had reached essentially the same conclusion. Of course, there may still be other kernel threads running or interrupt handlers that can interfere. It's probably okay to assume that drivers will handle these things. > Of course, it still doesn't prevent user space from disabling the runtime PM > framework's helpers via /sys/devices/.../power/control. True. So in the end this won't make much difference, but we might as well do it. Alan Stern _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
