On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 20:22 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Thanks, but I'd put that comment before the structure definition with the > "NOTE:" prefix and I think you should explain the reason why that field > shouldn't be changed to 64-bits. > Either you or James want to suggest a comment on why the field shouldn't be changed to 64-bits to be placed there? Tim _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
