Re: [PATCH wq#for-2.6.39] workqueue: add system_freezeable_wq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, Tejun Heo wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 10:10:46AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > 
> > > From de62c151df9b6568c67977920267392c432f340a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 10:39:03 +0100
> > > 
> > > Add system wide freezeable workqueue.
> > 
> > The preferred spelling is "freezable".
> 
> Hmmm... workqueue always has used freezeable (even before cmwq
> changes).  It seems like mass renaming is in order.  :-(

The name of create_freezeable_workqueue was misspelled originally and
then never changed.  But other code and most of the comments and 
documentation are spelled correctly -- grep for both spellings and 
you'll see.

Agreed, some renaming and editing is in order.

Alan Stern

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux