Hello, Dmitry, Rafael.
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 10:20:25AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > + thermal_wq = alloc_workqueue("thermal", WQ_FREEZEABLE, 0);
> >
> > Should probably be unbound as well.
>
> Yup, thanks.
Hmm.. why should it be unbound? Unbound wqs are primarily useful for
very long running (system daemon type) works which may also consume
considerable amount of cpu cycles.
> > FWIW, I would not mind if we had a global freezeable workqueue already
> > predefined. I could switch input_polldev and vmw_balloon to it and there
> > probably could be more users...
>
> Hmm, OK.
>
> Do you think we should add system_freezeable_wq to the set of predefined
> workqueues?
Oh, yeah, definitely. I'll write up a patch.
Thanks.
--
tejun
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
