Re: subtle pm_runtime_put_sync race and sdio functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> writes:

[...]

>> 
>> So, to summarize, as long as folks are OK with drivers directly calling
>> the subsystem runtime PM callbacks, I'll go this route.
>
> This is perfectly fine as long as you ensure that they won't be called
> concurrently through the runtime PM framework.

Yes, as long as they're only used in the suspend/resume (or _noirq
versions) this is guaranteed since the DPM core is already preventing
runtime PM transitions during suspend/resume.

Kevin
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux