On Sunday, January 23, 2011, Jeff Chua wrote: > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Saturday, January 22, 2011, Jeff Chua wrote: > >> 2011/1/22 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>: > >> > On Saturday, January 22, 2011, Jeff Chua wrote: > >> > >> > means that my patch [11/11] _and_ the replacement are totally wrong, because you have > >> > _multiple_ NVS regions. That really helped, thanks a lot. > >> > >> Would it be different if I offline all CPUs before suspending to ram? > >> It seems to help with suspending to disk. > > > > No, that doesn't matter. NVS regions are just sitting there regardless of > > what happens at run time. > > Strange. If I didn't offline, it hanged during suspend even without > thinkpad_acpi. I could see that the suspend code does the offline > automatically, but executing the offline before calling suspend makes > it no hanging. That means there's a problem in the CPU hotplug code that manifests itslef during suspend. Is this 100% reproducible? Did it happen with 2.6.37? Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
