On Monday, January 17, 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, January 17, 2011, Jeff Chua wrote:
> > I've just tried the recent linux git pull
> > (e78bf5e6cbe837daa6ab628a5f679548742994d3) and suspend-to-memory
> > works, but resume takes a very long time (30 seconds doing nothing).
> >
> > Bisected and it says first bad commit is
> > ca9b600be38c73b7d25acfb8b7e4e9a9e941d881
>
> Hmm. That's probably because acpi_os_unmap_memory() does the
> synchronize_rcu(), but I have no idea why it might cause a problem to
> occur in suspend_nvs_free().
>
> What happens if you replace the acpi_os_map_memory() in
> suspend_nvs_save() with ioremap_cache() and the acpi_os_unmap_memory() in
> suspend_nvs_free() with iounmap() ?
IOW, can you please test if the patch below makes a difference?
Rafael
---
drivers/acpi/nvs.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/nvs.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/nvs.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/nvs.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ void suspend_nvs_free(void)
free_page((unsigned long)entry->data);
entry->data = NULL;
if (entry->kaddr) {
- acpi_os_unmap_memory(entry->kaddr, entry->size);
+ iounmap(entry->kaddr);
entry->kaddr = NULL;
}
}
@@ -114,8 +114,8 @@ int suspend_nvs_save(void)
list_for_each_entry(entry, &nvs_list, node)
if (entry->data) {
- entry->kaddr = acpi_os_map_memory(entry->phys_start,
- entry->size);
+ entry->kaddr = ioremap_cache(entry->phys_start,
+ entry->size);
if (!entry->kaddr) {
suspend_nvs_free();
return -ENOMEM;
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
