Re: [PATCH 4/9] cpuidle: Introduce .abbr (abbrevation) for cpuidle states

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 12 January 2011 23:25:12 Len Brown wrote:
> > > If the display tools can only handle 3 characters,
> > > then why not have them simply use the 1st 3 characters
> > > of the existing name field?
> 
> > You mean use:
> > C3 NHM
> > instead of
> > NHM-C3
> > for intel_idle?
> 
> Yes.
> is there a reason that would be a problem?
A much more elegant solution came to my mind:
I'll rewrite the perf timechart patch to do:
Title:   C-stateName1 [1] , C-stateName2 [2]
and later I will refer to the states by 1, 2, ...
Eventually a:
Description:
[1] C-stateDescription1
[2] C-stateDescription2
...
can be put somewhere as well.

Please ignore this patch.

Stupid that I didn't think of that in the first place.

Thanks,

   Thomas
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux