On Friday, December 17, 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, December 17, 2010, Xu, Andiry wrote: > > > > > > and during shutdown (I believe the warnings are the same or analogous > > to > > > the > > > above). > > > > > > I tested with the attached patch from Andiry applied and I got the > > > following > > > BUG during resume: > > > > Does this bug occurs without the synchronize irq patch? > > Yes, it does. > > > Seems the rmmod, shutdown and resume bugs are caused by xhci_cleanup_msix(). > > > > > > > > [ 91.703778] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Starting disk > > > [ 91.704054] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Starting disk > > > [ 91.703680] xhci_hcd 0000:04:00.0: Host controller not halted, > > aborting > > > reset. > > > [ 91.703680] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at > > > /home/rafael/src/linux-2.6/kernel/mutex.c:278 > > > [ 91.703680] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 1234, name: > > > kworker/u:6 > > > [ 91.703680] INFO: lockdep is turned off. > > > [ 91.703680] irq event stamp: 24060 > > > [ 91.703680] hardirqs last enabled at (24059): [<ffffffff810aa071>] > > > rcu_note_context_switch+0xa1/0x1c0 > > > [ 91.703680] hardirqs last disabled at (24060): [<ffffffff81494e92>] > > > _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x12/0x50 > > > [ 91.703680] softirqs last enabled at (20026): [<ffffffff8105056e>] > > > __do_softirq+0x11e/0x160 > > > [ 91.703680] softirqs last disabled at (20011): [<ffffffff8100368c>] > > > call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 > > > [ 91.703680] Pid: 1234, comm: kworker/u:6 Tainted: G W > > 2.6.37- > > > rc6+ #12 > > > [ 91.703680] Call Trace: > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff81079290>] ? print_irqtrace_events+0xd0/0xe0 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff81036783>] __might_sleep+0x103/0x130 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff81492f73>] mutex_lock_nested+0x33/0x380 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff81495727>] ? > > > _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x67/0x70 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff810a39de>] ? dynamic_irq_cleanup+0xde/0x100 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff810a3a58>] irq_free_descs+0x58/0x90 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff81022008>] destroy_irq+0x78/0x90 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff810222c9>] native_teardown_msi_irq+0x9/0x10 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff811ee0b0>] > > default_teardown_msi_irqs+0x70/0xa0 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff811edb41>] free_msi_irqs+0xa1/0x110 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff811eec1d>] pci_disable_msix+0x3d/0x50 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffffa03f0609>] xhci_cleanup_msix+0x39/0x80 > > [xhci_hcd] > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffffa03f111c>] xhci_resume+0x1ac/0x250 > > [xhci_hcd] > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffffa03f65c4>] xhci_pci_resume+0x14/0x20 > > [xhci_hcd] > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff8138996b>] resume_common+0xbb/0x140 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff81389a5e>] hcd_pci_restore+0xe/0x10 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff811e36f3>] pci_pm_restore+0x63/0xb0 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff813334bd>] pm_op+0x19d/0x1c0 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff81333be4>] device_resume+0x94/0x220 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff81333d8c>] async_resume+0x1c/0x50 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff8106e6e6>] async_run_entry_fn+0x86/0x160 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff81060672>] process_one_work+0x1a2/0x450 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff81060614>] ? process_one_work+0x144/0x450 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff811d2704>] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x104/0x170 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff8106e660>] ? async_run_entry_fn+0x0/0x160 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff81061e32>] worker_thread+0x162/0x340 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff81061cd0>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x340 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff81066836>] kthread+0x96/0xa0 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff81003594>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff81036fdb>] ? finish_task_switch+0x7b/0xe0 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff81495d00>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff810667a0>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0 > > > [ 91.703680] [<ffffffff81003590>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10 > > > [ 91.706248] xhci_hcd 0000:04:00.0: irq 81 for MSI/MSI-X > > > [ 91.706251] xhci_hcd 0000:04:00.0: irq 82 for MSI/MSI-X > > > [ 91.706253] xhci_hcd 0000:04:00.0: irq 83 for MSI/MSI-X > > > [ 91.706256] xhci_hcd 0000:04:00.0: irq 84 for MSI/MSI-X > > > [ 91.706258] xhci_hcd 0000:04:00.0: irq 85 for MSI/MSI-X > > > [ 91.706260] xhci_hcd 0000:04:00.0: irq 86 for MSI/MSI-X > > > [ 91.706262] xhci_hcd 0000:04:00.0: irq 87 for MSI/MSI-X > > > > > > The issues appear to be 100% reproducible. Having looked at the xhci_hcd's suspend and resume I think it does some completely wrong things trying to work around the synchronize_irq(pci_dev->irq) done by suspend_common() in hcd-pci.c. The problem basically is that xhci uses several interrupt vectors, while the USB core seems to assume that there will be only one interrupt in use. So, Alan, can you please have a look at that and tell me what should be the right approach to fix this issue in your opinion? Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
