On Tuesday, December 21, 2010, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi Rafael. Hi, > As you may recall, I started working on a bunch of patches about six > months ago that have been very slow to get merged (yes, mostly my fault > for perhaps being overly careful about testing). Unfortunately, in the > process, you've merged other patches (the compression ones) that mean I > have to rewrite what I'd already done. > > To avoid this happening again, I'm proposing that I only work on one > patch (or very small series of patches) at a time, and not start on the > next one until you've merged the previous into your for-Linus tree. I'll > keep an overall plan of where I intend to go, but take things very > slowly so I don't waste time like that again. > > The downside is that means I won't always be able to show demonstrably > improvements immediately, but I guess we'll just have to cope with that > situation. I guess I can mitigate this downside by explaining where I'm > going, even if I can't provide numbers to prove it will be a real > improvement. > > Does this sound feasible to you? Yes, sounds reasonable. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
