Re: platform/i2c busses: pm runtime and system sleep

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 02:25:07PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, December 17, 2010, Mark Brown wrote:

> > It'd be really good if this could all be factored out into the PM core,
> > we're going to have to do the same thing for at least SPI as well and
> > possibly some other buses :/

> So how exactly the PM core is supposed to include those things?

> There certainly are other buses that don't want to do them.

By, for example, providing default implementations which the buses can
use if they choose to.
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux