2010/12/15 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>: > On Tuesday, December 14, 2010, Ming Lei wrote: >> Seems it may apply in other cases(dpm_prepare/dpm_suspend >> /dpm_suspend_noirq) too? > > I thought about that, but in these cases the status is changed after the > callback has returned and only if it's succeeded. Moreover, if the callback > hasn't been successful, the device is not moved to the new list, so I think > it's better to leave that as is. Yes, you are right, sorry for my noise, :-( thanks, -- Lei Ming _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
