On Thursday, December 02, 2010, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > OK, so please let me know what you think of the appended patch (on top of the
> > previous one).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rafael
> > Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/suspend.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/suspend.h
> > +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/suspend.h
> > @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ extern int unregister_pm_notifier(struct
> > /* drivers/base/power/wakeup.c */
> > extern bool events_check_enabled;
> >
> > -extern bool pm_check_wakeup_events(void);
> > +extern bool pm_wakeup_pending(void);
> > extern bool pm_get_wakeup_count(unsigned int *count);
> > extern bool pm_save_wakeup_count(unsigned int count);
> > #else /* !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
> > @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ static inline int unregister_pm_notifier
> >
> > #define pm_notifier(fn, pri) do { (void)(fn); } while (0)
> >
> > -static inline bool pm_check_wakeup_events(void) { return true; }
> > +static inline bool pm_wakeup_pending(void) { return true; }
>
> Shouldn't this return false?
Yes, it should, thanks!
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
