On Tuesday, November 30, 2010, Ming Lei wrote:
> 2010/11/28 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > Currently dpm_prepare() returns error code if it finds that a device
> > being suspended has a pending runtime resume request. However, it
> > should not do that if the checking for wakeup events is not enabled.
> > On the other hand, if the checking for wakeup events is enabled, it
> > can return error when a wakeup event is detected, regardless of its
> > source.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/power/main.c | 11 +++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/main.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/base/power/main.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/main.c
> > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > #include <linux/sched.h>
> > #include <linux/async.h>
> > +#include <linux/suspend.h>
> >
> > #include "../base.h"
> > #include "power.h"
> > @@ -1052,8 +1053,10 @@ static int dpm_prepare(pm_message_t stat
> > mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
> >
> > pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);
> > - if (pm_runtime_barrier(dev) && device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
> > - /* Wake-up requested during system sleep transition. */
> > + if (pm_runtime_barrier(dev) && device_may_wakeup(dev))
> > + pm_wakeup_event(dev, 0);
> > +
> > + if (pm_check_wakeup_events()) {
>
> If pm_check_wakeup_events returns true, it means there is no wakeup event
> coming, so seems should handle normal suspend prepare, but why
> abort the suspend here?
That's a bug, it should be !pm_check_wakeup_events() instead.
Thanks,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
