On 10-11-19 05:58 PM, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Mark Lord<kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> It now comes back at resume time. > > So that patch helped? I think so. It didn't used to resume from suspend with 2.6.36, and now it does. >> But suffers long delays (also sometimes with 2.6.35) doing this: >> >> [drm:atom_op_jump] *ERROR* atombios stuck in loop for more than 5secs >> aborting >> [drm:atom_execute_table_locked] *ERROR* atombios stuck executing E576 (len >> 105, WS 12, PS 8) @ 0xE5C4 >> [drm:atom_op_jump] *ERROR* atombios stuck in loop for more than 5secs >> aborting >> [drm:atom_execute_table_locked] *ERROR* atombios stuck executing ECD2 (len >> 86, WS 4, PS 0) @ 0xED05 >> [drm:atom_op_jump] *ERROR* atombios stuck in loop for more than 5secs >> aborting >> [drm:atom_execute_table_locked] *ERROR* atombios stuck executing E576 (len >> 105, WS 12, PS 8) @ 0xE5C4 >> PM: resume of devices complete after 15718.253 msecs >> > > It's be nice if you could bisect to track down when those started. It'd be even nicer if they hadn't started. :) What kernel release first had that atom/ops table in it? I'll try that. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm