On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> What about applying the patch below now and moving to the multiple list heads
> approach in the next cycle?
>
> Rafael
>
> ---
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: PM: Allow devices to be removed during late suspend and early resume
>
> Holding dpm_list_mtx across late suspend and early resume of devices
> is problematic for the PCMCIA subsystem and doesn't allow device
> objects to be removed by late suspend and early resume driver
> callbacks. This appears to be overly restrictive, as drivers are
> generally allowed to remove device objects in other phases of suspend
> and resume. Therefore rework dpm_{suspend|resume}_noirq() so that
> they don't have to hold dpm_list_mtx all the time.
This looks okay to me. Just like the other routines.
Alan Stern
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
