On Tuesday, October 26, 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 08:14:42PM -0400, Len Brown wrote: > > Rather than a black list of machines that can not survive saving NVS, > > I wonder how long a white list of machines requiring NVS save would be? > > Windows saves the NVS area in my testing. Either there's something that > indicates the choices of one behaviour over the other, or the machines > that are broken by NVS saving are actually tripping some other bug. Since we're claiming Windows compatibility through _OSI, we should follow Windows except for on machines that are blacklisted as not being Windows-compatible. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
