On 10/26/2010 8:32 AM, Pierre Tardy wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> How will future PCI (or other device) power saving tracepoints be called? >> >> Might be more consistent to use: >> >> power:cpu_idle >> power:machine_idle >> power:device_idle > Agree with this. > > FYI, I have a runtime_pm tracepoint currently cooking. Here is > preliminary patch. > Can this be a candidate for a "power:device_idle" tracepoint? I would like to see a slightly more advanced tracepoint do the runtime pm framework; specifically I'd like to see the "comm" of the process that's taking a refcount on a device (that way, powertop can track which process keeps a device busy) _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
