* Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Most definitely. It's no accident that it took such a long time for this issue > > to be raised in the first place. It's a rare occurance - > > Do you agree that this occurance happened now and these events should get cleaned > up before ARM and other archs make use of the broken interface? > > If not, discussing this further, is a big waste of time... and Jean would have to > try to adapt his ARM code on the broken ABI... The discussion seems to have died down somewhat. Please re-send to lkml the latest patches you have to remind everyone of the latest state of things - the merge window is getting near. My only compatibility/ABI point is basically that it shouldnt break _existing_ tracepoints (and users thereof). If your latest bits meet that then it ought to be a good first step. You are free to (and encouraged to) introduce more complete sets of events. Thanks, Ingo _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
