On Thursday, October 14, 2010, Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Wednesday, October 13, 2010, Sundar wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Sundar <sunder.svit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Sorry, I don't quite understand your question. I think it would be > > > >> okay to add an interface for userspace to cut short a runtime-suspend > > > >> delay, but I don't think anything more is needed. > > > > I'm not 100% sure how that interface is supposed to work. Can you elaborate > > a bit, please? > > There could be a new attribute file, or we could use a blank line > written to autosuspend_delay_ms for this purpose. Either way, the > result would be to call pm_runtime_suspend. If the device is idle, > merely awaiting the timer expiration for a scheduled suspend or > autosuspend, this would cause it to suspend immediately. That sounds reasonable. I wonder what the interested people think about it. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
