On Wednesday, October 13, 2010, Sundar wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Sundar <sunder.svit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Sorry, I don't quite understand your question. I think it would be > >> okay to add an interface for userspace to cut short a runtime-suspend > >> delay, but I don't think anything more is needed. I'm not 100% sure how that interface is supposed to work. Can you elaborate a bit, please? > > I was just confirming that it is agreed by all that we can definitely wrap > > this up via the standard PM helpers; through the accelerated suspend > > if no one has any other reservations. > > > > And I forgot one more point. Since this switch feature was one of the > requirements for the Meego framework, wouldnt it be nice if the Meego > people also put out their opinions on this newer solution? Yes, it would. There's a PM track at the Linux Plumbers conference in a few weeks and I think it would be good to discuss the issue in there. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
