Re: PATCH [0/4] perf: clean-up of power events API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thomas,

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thursday 07 October 2010 17:08:25 Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> [ Adding a few more CCs, since this discussion is about a tracepoint
>>   userspace ABI policy, which is a topic of general interest. ]
>>
> ...
>> Yes, sadly this debate running in circles hurts contributors.
>>
>> Thanks for the summary!
> Thanks for yours!
>
> So you (and Peter Zijlstra and some others) prefer the solution I
> posted with these two patches:
> [PATCH 1/2] PERF(kernel): Cleanup power events
My latest patch [1/4] is a rework of your patch. It adds:
- adaptation to linux-2.6-tip
- change of a wrong permission intel_idle.c
- light changes in the API (correction of trace printks ...)

I would prefer to use that version if you are ok.

> [PATCH 2/2] PERF(userspace): Adjust perf timechart to the new power events
>
> Those should be fine.
> Ingo, can you merge them, so that Jean can finally put his ARM
> specific implementation on top.
>
> Thanks,
>
>    Thomas
>

Jean
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux