Thomas, On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thursday 07 October 2010 17:08:25 Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >> [ Adding a few more CCs, since this discussion is about a tracepoint >> userspace ABI policy, which is a topic of general interest. ] >> > ... >> Yes, sadly this debate running in circles hurts contributors. >> >> Thanks for the summary! > Thanks for yours! > > So you (and Peter Zijlstra and some others) prefer the solution I > posted with these two patches: > [PATCH 1/2] PERF(kernel): Cleanup power events My latest patch [1/4] is a rework of your patch. It adds: - adaptation to linux-2.6-tip - change of a wrong permission intel_idle.c - light changes in the API (correction of trace printks ...) I would prefer to use that version if you are ok. > [PATCH 2/2] PERF(userspace): Adjust perf timechart to the new power events > > Those should be fine. > Ingo, can you merge them, so that Jean can finally put his ARM > specific implementation on top. > > Thanks, > > Thomas > Jean _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
