On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > I think last time Rafael mentioned that runtime PM did not allow for > > > forcing power state from userspace but I wonder if it would be possible > > > for userspace to signal and "accelerate" the idle state for a device and > > > then standard runtime PM framework would kick in... > > > > Yes; drivers can implement their runtime power policy any way they > > want. For example, a driver could create a sysfs attribute file which > > userspace could use to ask for changes in the power state. > > > > The real question is whether the driver is platform-specific. If it is > > then fine, it can do whatever it wants. If it isn't then it should > > try to avoid doing things that are tied to a specific platform. > > > > No, I really think it is wrong. This what leads us to the situation we > are in at the moment. Every device [re]implements its own little knobs > to do power management. Accelerometers export their (often tailored to a > specific platform) attributes in sysfs in nonstandard way. And so on, > and so forth. > > Here I'd like to see these (PM) hooks done on device core level, i.e. > the knobs should be unified and live in /sys/devices/.../deviceX/power/ I haven't followed this thread in detail. What sort of knobs are you talking about? That is, what needs to be done? Maybe the PM core already provides these features. Alan Stern _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
