On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Saturday, October 02, 2010, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > ... > > > At the moment it suspends when the network cable is removed from the device > > > and the hack I mentioned is used during the resume after the cable has been > > > reinserted (it checks if the cable is still there and schedules suspend if not). > > > > That does seem like a strange hack. Instead of scheduling a suspend, > > why not simply do a suspend as soon as you learn that the cable has > > been removed again? Is there a problem about the connection status > > bouncing? > > I don't remember 100%, but ISTR there was a problem with that. Regardless, it seems like the sort of thing autosuspend would handle easily with no need for idle notifications. Just call pm_runtime_mark_last_busy when the cable is plugged in, then do the runtime resume, and then call pm_request_autosuspend. The check for the cable being disconnected would have to move from the runtime_idle callback to the runtime_suspend callback -- but then the runtime_idle callback wouldn't have to be present at all. Alan Stern P.S.: Kevin, it looks like your name somehow got removed from the CC list on my last message. This was odd because the message contained a question directed at you. In case you didn't receive it, here's a link: https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2010-October/028908.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
