Hi. On 27/09/10 19:38, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 06:29:35PM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: >>>> As discussed, here are the patches, modified to apply against your current >>>> linux-next tree. A new first patch splits compression support out into its >>>> own file, removing the need to have two versions of the load_image and >>>> save_image routines, minimising the changes to the remainder of the >>>> patches and making things cleaner than would otherwise be the case. >>>> >>>> On my laptop, single-threaded compression actually slows writing down from >>>> 175MB/s to around 100-120MB/s (depending on how well the image compresses). >>>> Reading speed improves from 218MB/s to around 245MB/s. I expect that >>>> multithreaded writing would bring the writing (and reading) speeds back >>>> up. It's on my swsusp to do list :) >>> Works here. >> >> Ah. You're too fast for me :) >> >> What sort of speeds are you seeing? > Well, I don't see any 'PM: Image read at' etc in the kernel logs after > resuming (in for-rafael tree). You need CONFIG_PM_DEBUG enabled for that. Perhaps I should remove that requirement. Nigel _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
