Re: [PATCH v4] power: introduce library for device-specific OPPs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday, September 24, 2010, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 07:50:40AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
...
> 
> Looks like a good start!!!  Some questions and suggestions about RCU
> usage interspersed below.
...
> > + * Locking: RCU reader.
> > + */
> > +int opp_get_opp_count(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct device_opp *dev_opp;
> > +	struct opp *temp_opp;
> > +	int count = 0;
> > +
> > +	dev_opp = find_device_opp(dev);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(dev_opp))
> > +		return PTR_ERR(dev_opp);
> > +
> > +	rcu_read_lock();
> > +	list_for_each_entry_rcu(temp_opp, &dev_opp->opp_list, node) {
> > +		if (temp_opp->available)
> > +			count++;
> > +	}
> > +	rcu_read_unlock();
> 
> This one is OK as well.  You are returning a count, so if all of the
> counted structures are freed at this point, no problem.  The count was
> valid when it was accumulated, and the fact that it might now be obsolete
> is (usually) not a problem.

However, it looks like it should run rcu_read_lock() before calling
find_device_opp(dev), shouldn't it?

Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux