On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 08:29:33PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> +struct opp_def {
> + unsigned long freq;
> + unsigned long u_volt;
> +
> + bool enabled;
> +};
It might be clearer to use some term other than enabled in the code -
when reading I wasn't immediately sure if enabled meant that it was
available to be selected or if it was the active operating point. How
about 'allowed' (though I'm not 100% happy with that)?
> +static inline int opp_add(struct device *dev, const struct opp_def *opp_def)
> +{
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +}
Mismatch with the return type and value here.
> +/**
> + * opp_enable() - Enable a specific OPP
> + * @opp: Pointer to opp
> + *
> + * Enables a provided opp. If the operation is valid, this returns 0, else the
> + * corresponding error value.
> + *
> + * OPP used here is from the the opp_is_valid/opp_has_freq or other search
> + * functions
> + */
> +int opp_enable(struct opp *opp)
> +{
> + if (unlikely(!opp || IS_ERR(opp))) {
> + pr_err("%s: Invalid parameters being passed\n", __func__);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (!opp->enabled && opp->dev_opp)
> + opp->dev_opp->enabled_opp_count++;
> +
> + opp->enabled = true;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
When reading the description I'd expected to see some facility to
trigger selection of an active operating point in the library (possibly
as a separate call since you might have a bunch of operating points
being updated in quick succession) but it looks like that needs to be
supplied externally at the minute?
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
