Am Dienstag, 14. September 2010, 17:23:15 schrieb Alan Stern: > On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > > > Should I have used usb_autopm_get_interface_no_resume()? > > > > > > That actually would work. It's a good idea. The only drawback (not a > > > big one) is that if the device _was_ suspended with remote wakeup > > > enabled, doing this wouldn't turn off remote wakeup. I think that > > > doesn't matter. > > > > I am afraid it does matter as devices whose remote wakeup is enabled > > may draw more power. > > I doubt it, or at least, not very much more. They are still limited by > the USB spec as to the total amount of current they can draw while > suspended. 7.2.3 Sources of remote wakeup may draw 2.5mA when suspended as opposed to 0.5 mA Regards Oliver _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
