Am Montag, 13. September 2010, 22:02:16 schrieb Alan Stern: > > > Is there any point in resuming the device during close() just in order > > > to kill the interrupt URB? It seems counterproductive -- if the device > > > had been suspended then there wouldn't be any interrupt URB to kill in > > > the first place. > > > > Suppose the device does not support remote wakeup. It would never > > be autosuspended while it is open, but simply resetting the flag > > would never reach the PM layer. > > Whoops, that's right. I didn't see the assignment to > needs_remote_wakeup. Should I have used usb_autopm_get_interface_no_resume()? Regards Oliver _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
