On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:20:23PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Montag, 13. September 2010, 19:10:47 schrieb Dmitry Torokhov: > > > I think this introduces significant change in behavior though - before > > we did not do usb_autopm_put_interface() on successful open, basically > > disabling autopm facilities, right? > > Right. Which makes no sense at all. You'd better remove anything related > to runtime PM and not set supports_autosuspend for that. > That not what I meant, I do not want to remove autopm, it's just it was effectively disabled and if we fix it we might start getting some regression reports ;) -- Dmitry _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
