Re: [PATCH] PM: lenient generic runtime pm callbacks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, September 08, 2010, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 01:20:42AM +0300, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> > Allow drivers, that belong to subsystems which use the generic
> > runtime pm callbacks, not to define runtime pm suspend/resume handlers,
> > by implicitly assuming success in such cases.
> > 
> > This is needed to eliminate nop handlers that would otherwise be
> > necessary by drivers which enable runtime pm, but don't need
> > to do anything when their devices are runtime-suspended/resumed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> As I said previously this would also remove some dummy suspend functions
> I need for some MFDs.

Applied to suspend-2.6/linux-next.

Thanks,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux