On Monday, September 06, 2010, M. Vefa Bicakci wrote: > On 05/09/10 10:08 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > >>> ok, thanks. probably I've catched your point. please feel free to use my reviewed-by > >>> for your fix. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> In the meantime, though, I prepared a patch that should address the issue > >> entirely. The patch is appended and if it looks good to you, I'd rather use it > >> instead of the previous one (it is still untested). > > > > Yeah, this one looks nicer to me :) > > > > Thanks, rafael! > > Dear Rafael Wysocki, Kosaki Motohiro and Minchan Kim, > > Upon Kosaki Motohiro's kind request via an off-list e-mail, > I tested the following two patches separately with a vanilla > 2.6.35.4 kernel: > > Patch 1: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/9/5/86 > > Patch 2: > http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2010/9/4/4615426 > > The first of these was prepared by Minchan Kim, and it fixes > the issue; i.e. no hangs during hibernation with a full tmpfs. We've already agreed that this patch should be applied. > However, the second patch, prepared by Rafael Wysocki, does *not* > fix the problem. I still experience hangs with a full tmpfs upon > hibernation. So we still manage to trigger OOM with this approach. > As always, I am willing to test newer patches and help in debugging > this issue. What happens if you apply them both at the same time? Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
