On Thursday, September 02, 2010, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > On 09/02/2010 10:28 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > That would be very nice. In particular, I'd like to get rid of the > > > pm_message_t thing if possible. And I'd like to avoid putting the > > > controller into D3 before creating hibernation image. :-) > > Ultimately I don't think it will be possible to get rid of pm_message_t > throughout the entire kernel. Not just because it's a legacy thing > spread all over the place, but because it sometimes is genuinely > useful. In situations where there are only minimal differences between > the various suspend/resume paths, it makes a lot of sense to call a > single function and tell it which type of operation to perform. Well, that's why I said "if possible" above. :-) Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
