On Saturday, August 21, 2010, Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 01:36 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > As I wrote, I think it's better to select CRYPTO_LZO here. > > This does a different thing, as I understand it. It brings in a crypto > API, which we neither need nor use (we just use compress/decompress from > LZO library). > > All the other systems I quoted in the other e-mail select this directly, > because they don't need the crypto API either. So, I reckon we should do > the same - it is simpler and brings in less stuff, which is always > better. > > But, if you say this is how it has to be, then we'll do that. Well, I looked at the code in the meantime and it apparently is sufficient to select LZO_COMPRESS and LZO_DECOMPRESS. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
