Re: Notes from the Boston Linux Power Management Mini-summit - August 9th, 2010

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 01:36:33AM -0400, Len Brown wrote:

> A gap:
> 
> On OMAP, bus control is independent of CPU frequency control,
> so cpufreq and cpuidle don't quite fit the bill.
> 
> Perhaps a "bus-idle" analogous to "cpu-idle" may be appropriate?

FWIW this applies to a bunch of other embedded processors too - OMAP
isn't particularly unique here, though it's one of the furthest along in
terms of exploting this in mainline Linux.
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux