Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 08:52:22PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>  4) no, we can't say anything about what opportunistic suspend means in practice
>
> Here I disagree.  The Android folks have used it for quite some time.
> We might not be able to apply their experience directly to other software
> stacks, but we should nevertheless be able to learn quite a bit from it.

So when it comes to practice you are relying solely on what Android people say.

If it's true that it's easy to spot the "PM-driving applications",
then it shouldn't be hard for a guy from the Android team to assemble
a basic typical system (X.org, dbus, etc.) with suspend-blockers in a
couple of days.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux