Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 08:18:22PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>> You are tightly linking suspend blockers with Android. If they were a
>> sensible general solution they would be generic not tied closely to
>> Android
>
> Android is certainly where suspend blockers originated, and is to the best
> of my knowledge is still the only platform that uses them.  But there is
> a first user of every new mechanism, and for some time that first user
> will by definition be the only user of that mechanism.  So the fact
> that Android is most probably the only user of suspend blockers does
> not prove anything about whether or not suspend blockers are sensible.

No, it's the fact that *nobody* else has said: hey, that looks like a
good idea, we should use that in our mobile platform (or any
platform).

-- 
Felipe Contreras
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux