Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, August 10, 2010, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> 2010/8/9 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>:
> > On Monday, August 09, 2010, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
...
> 
> > Anyway, as I said I'm not opposed to the idea of using a special type of
> > objects for collecting debug information on wakeup events, so please free to
> > submit patches modifying the current mainline kernel code in that direction.
> >
> 
> How do you prefer to handle your pci wakeup events? Add a handle to
> every device or pci device? Or use a global handle to avoid the race
> and report wakeup events for debugging separately?

The latter, maybe?

Thanks,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux