On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:07:20AM -0700, david@xxxxxxx wrote: > If the primary difference between sleep and suspend is not scheduling > processes, instead of messing with oppurtinistic suspend/suspend > blockers/wakelocks/etc, why not just 'temporarily' change the timer fuzz > value to a very large value (say an hour). That would still let things > like openoffice saves ahve a fair chance to trigger before the battery > died completely, but would wake the system so infrequently that it will > be effectivly the same as a full suspend. Because it only affects processes that sleep. It's a question of how much pathology you want to be able to tolerate. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
