On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 20:05 -0700, mark gross wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 04:03:20PM -0700, Bryan Huntsman wrote: >>> > >>> > Mike, one idea I'm exploring is having platform-specific busses with >>> > QoS constraints specified via runtime_pm as part of the LDM. Adding >>> > dynamic class creation within pm_qos, or a type enum as you suggest, >>> > would work. However, I think this kind of behavior would fit nicely >>> > within runtime_pm. >>> > >>> >>> Something like that is what Kevin Hilman was thinking too. It would >>> bring a qos concept to the LDM for each bus driver object. >> [...] > It would be great if we could all get together at one of the > conferences this year to talk through some of our ideas in more > detail. I plan to be at ELC Europe (October in UK) and Linux Plumbers > (Nov in Boston) with a remote possibility of making it to LinuxCon > (Aug in Boston, which includes a PM mini-summit on Monday.) FYI... I've added a proposal to the PM mini-conf at Plumbers to have more detailed discussion on per-device constraints: http://www.linuxplumbersconf.org/2010/ocw/events/LPC2010MC/proposals Kevin _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
