On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 04:19:20PM -0700, david@xxxxxxx wrote: > >> only consider the activity of a subset of processes when deciding if we >> should suspend or not. If the decision is to suspend, freeze everything. >> >> you (and many other people) are confusing what I've proposed (use cgroups >> to indicate what processes to care about and what ones to not care about >> when deciding to suspend/go to idle) with the prior cgroup proposal (use >> cgroups to freeze a subset of tasks while leaving others runnable) > > The decision on whether or not to go to sleep isn't the difficult bit of > this problem space. but isn't that all that wakelocks do? affect the decision on whether or not to go to sleep. David Lang _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
