Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 00:10:21 -0700
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >
> > you are stating that this must be suspend because low-power idle must be
> > transparent to the user.
> 
> It must be transparent to the rest of the system.

Perhaps transparent is badly worded. Both suspend and idle are in some
way "transparent". Idle doesnt happen when an application is runnable.
Suspend is transparent in that the application can not easily detect if
it happened. 

Cheers,
Flo
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux