Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2010/8/3 Olivier Galibert <galibert@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 08:39:22PM -0700, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
>> If you just program the alarm you will wake up see that the monotonic
>> clock has not advanced and set the alarm another n seconds into the
>> future. Or are proposing that suspend should be changed to keep the
>> monotonic clock running?
>
> You're supposed to fix the clock after you wake up.  That's part of
> the cost of going suspend.

I'm not sure what you are referring to. The generic Linux timekeeping
code makes sure the monotonic clock stops while the system is
suspended regardless of what values the (hardware specific)
clocksource returns.

-- 
Arve Hjønnevåg
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux