On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 2:06 AM, <david@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > yes, it could mean a doubleing in the number of cgroups that you need on a > system. and if there are other features like this you can end up in a > geometric explosion in the number of cgroups. No, it would be additive - you can mount different subsystems on separate hierarchies. So if you had X divisions for memory, Y divisions for CPU and Z divisions for suspend-blocking (where Z=2, probably?) you could mount three separate hierarchies and have X+Y+Z complexity, not X*Y*Z. (Not that I have a strong opinion on whether cgroups is an appropriate mechanism for solving this problem - just that the problem you forsee shouldn't occur in practice). Paul _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
